CLASSIC SOFT PRETZELS vs B.B.Q. PORK BAO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC SOFT PRETZELS wins in 8 out of 12 nutrient categories
CLASSIC SOFT PRETZELS: 8
vs
B.B.Q. PORK BAO: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC SOFT PRETZELS | B.B.Q. PORK BAO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 cal | 212 cal | |
| Protein | 7.0 g | 4.7 g | |
| Carbs | 57.8 g | 29.4 g | |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 7.7 g | |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC SOFT PRETZELS | B.B.Q. PORK BAO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 1 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC SOFT PRETZELS | B.B.Q. PORK BAO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 113 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 5.1 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 99 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 521 MG | 241 MG |