CLASSIC (RENDERED) DUCK FAT vs TAMARI
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TAMARI wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC (RENDERED) DUCK FAT: 0
vs
TAMARI: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC (RENDERED) DUCK FAT | TAMARI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 867 cal | 33 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 93.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC (RENDERED) DUCK FAT | TAMARI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC (RENDERED) DUCK FAT | TAMARI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 400 MG | 6,667 MG |