CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs MISO SESAME DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MISO SESAME DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 1
vs
MISO SESAME DRESSING: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | MISO SESAME DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 433 cal | 235 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 17.7 g | |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 17.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | MISO SESAME DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | MISO SESAME DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 1,029 MG |