CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING vs SUGAR FREE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUGAR FREE DRESSING wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING: 1
vs
SUGAR FREE DRESSING: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | SUGAR FREE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 3.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 46.7 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC RANCH DRESSING | SUGAR FREE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 600 MG |