CLASSIC PORK RINDS vs RICE MINIS CRISPY RICE SNACKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC PORK RINDS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC PORK RINDS: 3
vs
RICE MINIS CRISPY RICE SNACKS: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | RICE MINIS CRISPY RICE SNACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 50 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 86.7 g | |
| Fat | 42.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | RICE MINIS CRISPY RICE SNACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC PORK RINDS | RICE MINIS CRISPY RICE SNACKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,500 MG | 733 MG |