CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS PLANT PROTEIN vs 100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS PLANT PROTEIN wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS PLANT PROTEIN: 5
vs
100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS PLANT PROTEIN | 100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 283 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 17.4 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 6.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 4.5 g | |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS PLANT PROTEIN | 100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS PLANT PROTEIN | 100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 109 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 478 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 522 MG | 58 MG |