CLASSIC MINI CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS vs CHICKEN TENDERLOIN FRITTERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC MINI CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC MINI CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS: 5
vs
CHICKEN TENDERLOIN FRITTERS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC MINI CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS | CHICKEN TENDERLOIN FRITTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 276 cal | 222 cal | |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 13.6 g | |
| Carbs | 29.0 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fat | 14.5 g | 11.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC MINI CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS | CHICKEN TENDERLOIN FRITTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 6.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC MINI CORN DOGS BATTER WRAPPED CHICKEN MINI FRANKS | CHICKEN TENDERLOIN FRITTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 132 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 645 MG | 568 MG |