CLASSIC MEDITERRANEAN PLANT BASED HUMMUS DRESSING vs CHIPOTLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC MEDITERRANEAN PLANT BASED HUMMUS DRESSING wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC MEDITERRANEAN PLANT BASED HUMMUS DRESSING: 8
vs
CHIPOTLE: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC MEDITERRANEAN PLANT BASED HUMMUS DRESSING | CHIPOTLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 643 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC MEDITERRANEAN PLANT BASED HUMMUS DRESSING | CHIPOTLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC MEDITERRANEAN PLANT BASED HUMMUS DRESSING | CHIPOTLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 821 MG |