CLASSIC ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE vs BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
CLASSIC ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 6
vs
BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE | BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 295 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 10.3 g | |
| Carbs | 1.5 g | 3.9 g | |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 26.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE | BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 7.7 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC ITALIAN CHICKEN SAUSAGE | BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 15 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 250 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 794 MG | 1,128 MG |