CLASSIC GLAZE WITH BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA vs RED COOKING WINE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RED COOKING WINE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC GLAZE WITH BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA: 0
vs
RED COOKING WINE: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC GLAZE WITH BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA | RED COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 cal | 117 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 53.3 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC GLAZE WITH BALSAMIC VINEGAR OF MODENA | RED COOKING WINE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 33 MG | 467 MG |