CLASSIC FRENCH DRESSING vs RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC FRENCH DRESSING: 0
vs
RANCH DRESSING: 4
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC FRENCH DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 367 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 10 g | Tie |
| Fat | 36.7 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC FRENCH DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC FRENCH DRESSING | RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 50 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 417 MG | 967 MG |