CLASSIC FINELY DICED MUSHROOMS vs TAMARIND SEEDLESS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC FINELY DICED MUSHROOMS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC FINELY DICED MUSHROOMS: 3
vs
TAMARIND SEEDLESS: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC FINELY DICED MUSHROOMS | TAMARIND SEEDLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 26 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 2.6 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC FINELY DICED MUSHROOMS | TAMARIND SEEDLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC FINELY DICED MUSHROOMS | TAMARIND SEEDLESS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 684 MG | 833 MG |