CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK vs ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK: 3
vs
ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK | ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 289 cal | 214 cal | |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 12.9 g | |
| Carbs | 31.6 g | 12.9 g | |
| Fat | 14.5 g | 12.1 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK | ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC CORN DOGS BATTER-WRAPPED FRANKS ON A STICK | ORIGINAL PORK BABY BACK RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 53 MG | 57 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 803 MG | 521 MG |