CLASSIC CANNED MEAT vs WESTERN FAMILY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WESTERN FAMILY wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC CANNED MEAT: 3
vs
WESTERN FAMILY: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC CANNED MEAT | WESTERN FAMILY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC CANNED MEAT | WESTERN FAMILY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC CANNED MEAT | WESTERN FAMILY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 125 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,411 MG | 464 MG |