CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH BIG BITES FILLED MARSHMALLOWS vs FRUIT RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FRUIT RINGS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH BIG BITES FILLED MARSHMALLOWS: 3
vs
FRUIT RINGS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH BIG BITES FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | FRUIT RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 295 cal | |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 71.4 g | 70 g | |
| Fat | 9.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH BIG BITES FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | FRUIT RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH BIG BITES FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | FRUIT RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 105 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 38 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 190 MG | 22 MG |