CINNAMON RAISIN COOKIES vs FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CINNAMON RAISIN COOKIES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CINNAMON RAISIN COOKIES: 6
vs
FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CINNAMON RAISIN COOKIES | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 446 cal | 478 cal | |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 4.4 g | |
| Carbs | 51.8 g | 69.6 g | |
| Fat | 26.8 g | 21.7 g | |
| Fiber | 8.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CINNAMON RAISIN COOKIES | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CINNAMON RAISIN COOKIES | FUDGE COVERED GRAHAM COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 500 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 143 MG | 348 MG |