CHOCOPOLITAN CHOCOLATE vs COCONUT ALMOND FUDGE RICH FUDGE FLAKES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOPOLITAN CHOCOLATE wins in 9 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOPOLITAN CHOCOLATE: 9
vs
COCONUT ALMOND FUDGE RICH FUDGE FLAKES: 0
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOPOLITAN CHOCOLATE | COCONUT ALMOND FUDGE RICH FUDGE FLAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 247 cal | |
| Protein | 4 g | 3.2 g | |
| Carbs | 24 g | 29.0 g | |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 14.0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOPOLITAN CHOCOLATE | COCONUT ALMOND FUDGE RICH FUDGE FLAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOPOLITAN CHOCOLATE | COCONUT ALMOND FUDGE RICH FUDGE FLAKES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 108 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 253 MG | 204 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 73 MG | 43 MG |