CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW vs GUMMI PEACH RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GUMMI PEACH RINGS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW: 2
vs
GUMMI PEACH RINGS: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW | GUMMI PEACH RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 381 cal | 292 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 76.2 g | 67.5 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW | GUMMI PEACH RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATY COATED MARSHMALLOW | GUMMI PEACH RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 83 MG | 38 MG |