CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SNOWMEN vs HILCO
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SNOWMEN wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SNOWMEN: 4
vs
HILCO: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SNOWMEN | HILCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 409 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 81.8 g | 100 g | |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SNOWMEN | HILCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SNOWMEN | HILCO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 145 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |