CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS vs PALMER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PALMER wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS: 3
vs
PALMER: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | PALMER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 409 cal | 535 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.3 g | |
| Carbs | 81.8 g | 67.4 g | |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 30.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | PALMER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | PALMER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 145 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 58 MG |