CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS vs MINI MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MINI MARSHMALLOWS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS: 2
vs
MINI MARSHMALLOWS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | MINI MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 409 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 81.8 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 9.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATEY COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | MINI MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 145 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 50 MG |