CHOCOLATE SKIM MILK vs EVAPORATED FILLED MILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EVAPORATED FILLED MILK wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE SKIM MILK: 2
vs
EVAPORATED FILLED MILK: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE SKIM MILK | EVAPORATED FILLED MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 55 cal | 117 cal | |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 10.2 g | 10 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE SKIM MILK | EVAPORATED FILLED MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE SKIM MILK | EVAPORATED FILLED MILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 127 MG | 267 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 317 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 59 MG | 117 MG |