CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS vs SLO POKE CLASSIC CANDIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS: 6
vs
SLO POKE CLASSIC CANDIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | SLO POKE CLASSIC CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 2.5 g | |
| Carbs | 64.9 g | 72.5 g | |
| Fat | 13.5 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | SLO POKE CLASSIC CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | SLO POKE CLASSIC CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 54 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 243 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 68 MG | 312 MG |