CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS vs BLACK TAFFY CLASSIC CANDIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS: 6
vs
BLACK TAFFY CLASSIC CANDIES: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | BLACK TAFFY CLASSIC CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 64.9 g | 85 g | |
| Fat | 13.5 g | 6.3 g | |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | BLACK TAFFY CLASSIC CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE-ON-CHOCOLATE FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | BLACK TAFFY CLASSIC CANDIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 54 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 243 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 68 MG | 75 MG |