CHOCOLATE NOTMILK PLANT-BASED MILK ALTERNATIVE vs SILK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SILK wins in 10 out of 16 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE NOTMILK PLANT-BASED MILK ALTERNATIVE: 4
vs
SILK: 10
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE NOTMILK PLANT-BASED MILK ALTERNATIVE | SILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 55 cal | 59 cal | |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 2.1 g | |
| Carbs | 6.8 g | 10.6 g | |
| Fat | 2.1 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE NOTMILK PLANT-BASED MILK ALTERNATIVE | SILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin | 0 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 0.3 UG | 1.3 UG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 3 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE NOTMILK PLANT-BASED MILK ALTERNATIVE | SILK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 139 MG | 191 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 17 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 0 MG | 34 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 97 MG | 153 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 76 MG | 38 MG |