CHOCOLATE MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED NUTS vs BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED NUTS: 5
vs
BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED NUTS | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 545 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 6.1 g | |
| Carbs | 56.7 g | 51.5 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 9.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED NUTS | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 3.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED NUTS | BIRMINGHAM CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 73 MG | 61 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.3 MG | 5.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 220 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 50 MG | 0 MG |