CHOCOLATE MALT BALLS vs RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE MALT BALLS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE MALT BALLS: 5
vs
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 3
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE MALT BALLS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 488 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 67.4 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 25.6 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 2.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE MALT BALLS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE MALT BALLS | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 116 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 47 MG | 100 MG |