CHOCOLATE FLOWER vs RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE FLOWER: 4
vs
RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE FLOWER | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 560 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 58 g | 60 g | |
| Fat | 36 g | 35 g | |
| Fiber | 2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE FLOWER | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE FLOWER | RICEMILK CHOCOLATE FLAVORED CONFECTIONARY MINIS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 160 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.4 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 80 MG | 100 MG |