CHOCOLATE COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS vs MARSHMALLOW CONFECTIONS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW CONFECTIONS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS: 3
vs
MARSHMALLOW CONFECTIONS: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | MARSHMALLOW CONFECTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 409 cal | 360 cal | |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 4 g | |
| Carbs | 68.2 g | 64 g | |
| Fat | 13.6 g | 12 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | MARSHMALLOW CONFECTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED MARSHMALLOW SANTAS | MARSHMALLOW CONFECTIONS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 45 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 57 MG | 100 MG |