CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS vs GHIRARDELLI CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS: 7
vs
GHIRARDELLI CHOCOLATE: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS | GHIRARDELLI CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 406 cal | 467 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 56.3 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS | GHIRARDELLI CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED CINNAMON MARSHMALLOWS | GHIRARDELLI CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 94 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 225 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 78 MG | 0 MG |