CHOCOLATE COVERED CANDY CANE MARSHMALLOWS vs HAMMOND'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE COVERED CANDY CANE MARSHMALLOWS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED CANDY CANE MARSHMALLOWS: 7
vs
HAMMOND'S: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED CANDY CANE MARSHMALLOWS | HAMMOND'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 88.9 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED CANDY CANE MARSHMALLOWS | HAMMOND'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 7.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 286 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 18 MG | 0 MG |