CHOCOLATE CHIP MINI COOKIES vs FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE CHIP MINI COOKIES wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE CHIP MINI COOKIES: 6
vs
FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE CHIP MINI COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 481 cal | 448 cal | |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 70.4 g | 69.0 g | |
| Fat | 22.2 g | 17.2 g | |
| Fiber | 3.7 g | 3.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE CHIP MINI COOKIES | FUDGE MARSHMALLOW RING COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 52 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.7 MG | 3.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 78 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 296 MG | 172 MG |