CHOCOLATE ALMOND HORSESHOE vs PREMIUM WHITE VALENTINE BARK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE ALMOND HORSESHOE wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE ALMOND HORSESHOE: 8
vs
PREMIUM WHITE VALENTINE BARK: 1
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE ALMOND HORSESHOE | PREMIUM WHITE VALENTINE BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 474 cal | 525 cal | |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 60.5 g | 67.5 g | |
| Fat | 23.7 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 2.6 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE ALMOND HORSESHOE | PREMIUM WHITE VALENTINE BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE ALMOND HORSESHOE | PREMIUM WHITE VALENTINE BARK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 66 MG | 100 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 118 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 75 MG |