CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING vs KROGER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING: 4
vs
KROGER: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | KROGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 419 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 19.4 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 38.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | KROGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIPOTLE RANCH DRESSING | KROGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 903 MG |