CHIPOTLE BARBECUE GLAZED SALMON FILLETS vs WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHIPOTLE BARBECUE GLAZED SALMON FILLETS: 4
vs
WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIPOTLE BARBECUE GLAZED SALMON FILLETS | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 127 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 19.1 g | 11 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 26 g | |
| Fat | 4.0 g | 11 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIPOTLE BARBECUE GLAZED SALMON FILLETS | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIPOTLE BARBECUE GLAZED SALMON FILLETS | WILD ALASKA BATTERED FISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 16 MG | 20 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 220 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 107 MG | 470 MG |