CHIPOTLE AND CHEDDAR SAUSAGE vs UNCURED TURKEY FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED TURKEY FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHIPOTLE AND CHEDDAR SAUSAGE: 4
vs
UNCURED TURKEY FRANKS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIPOTLE AND CHEDDAR SAUSAGE | UNCURED TURKEY FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 272 cal | 176 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 11.8 g | |
| Carbs | 6.0 g | 2.9 g | |
| Fat | 19.9 g | 13.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIPOTLE AND CHEDDAR SAUSAGE | UNCURED TURKEY FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 11.9 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIPOTLE AND CHEDDAR SAUSAGE | UNCURED TURKEY FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 66 MG | 118 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 1.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 907 MG | 765 MG |