CHINOOK KING SALMON vs NANG FAH (TUE KUNG)
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHINOOK KING SALMON wins in 9 out of 14 nutrient categories
CHINOOK KING SALMON: 9
vs
NANG FAH (TUE KUNG): 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHINOOK KING SALMON | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 cal | 260 cal | |
| Protein | 20 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 20 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHINOOK KING SALMON | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 4.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 1.4 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 12 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHINOOK KING SALMON | NANG FAH (TUE KUNG) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Phosphorus, P | 94 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 66 MG | 260 MG |