CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE vs WHOLE GRAIN MUSTARD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WHOLE GRAIN MUSTARD wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE: 1
vs
WHOLE GRAIN MUSTARD: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE | WHOLE GRAIN MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 216 cal | 200 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 59.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE | WHOLE GRAIN MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHINESE STYLE SWEET-&-TANGY DIPPING SAUCE | WHOLE GRAIN MUSTARD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 30 MG | 1,400 MG |