CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE LINKS vs SNAPPY GRILLER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE LINKS wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE LINKS: 7
vs
SNAPPY GRILLER: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE LINKS | SNAPPY GRILLER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 320 cal | |
| Protein | 15.8 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 13.2 g | 8 g | |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 28 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE LINKS | SNAPPY GRILLER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 1 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE LINKS | SNAPPY GRILLER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 13 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 368 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,368 MG | 1,040 MG |