CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE vs PORK AL PASTOR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
PORK AL PASTOR wins in 7 out of 12 nutrient categories
CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE: 2
vs
PORK AL PASTOR: 7
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | PORK AL PASTOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 524 cal | 271 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 15.7 g | |
| Carbs | 9.5 g | 5.7 g | |
| Fat | 45.2 g | 21.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | PORK AL PASTOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHINESE STYLE SAUSAGE | PORK AL PASTOR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 23 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,452 MG | 829 MG |