CHIN CHIN vs CLASSIC SIMPLE HIBISCUS TEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC SIMPLE HIBISCUS TEA wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHIN CHIN: 0
vs
CLASSIC SIMPLE HIBISCUS TEA: 2
(8 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIN CHIN | CLASSIC SIMPLE HIBISCUS TEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 cal | 8 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6 g | 2.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIN CHIN | CLASSIC SIMPLE HIBISCUS TEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIN CHIN | CLASSIC SIMPLE HIBISCUS TEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |