CHICK'N PATTIES COATED WITH A CRISPY GOLDEN CRUMB vs CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICK'N PATTIES COATED WITH A CRISPY GOLDEN CRUMB: 3
vs
CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICK'N PATTIES COATED WITH A CRISPY GOLDEN CRUMB | CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 cal | 189 cal | |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 14.4 g | |
| Carbs | 12.5 g | 12.2 g | |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 8.9 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICK'N PATTIES COATED WITH A CRISPY GOLDEN CRUMB | CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED PLANT-BASED CHICK'N TENDERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 2.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 575 MG | 500 MG |