CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA: 7
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 2
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 164 cal | 270 cal | |
| Protein | 13.6 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 14.8 g | |
| Fat | 10 g | 18.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 164 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.0 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 564 MG | 303 MG |