CHICKEN SLOW COOKER vs HIDDEN VALLEY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN SLOW COOKER wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN SLOW COOKER: 3
vs
HIDDEN VALLEY: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN SLOW COOKER | HIDDEN VALLEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 57.1 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN SLOW COOKER | HIDDEN VALLEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 240 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN SLOW COOKER | HIDDEN VALLEY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 9,571 MG | 5,333 MG |