CHICKEN vs ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN: 6
vs
ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET: 3
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN | ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 353 cal | |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 12.9 g | |
| Carbs | 28.6 g | 18.8 g | |
| Fat | 8.0 g | 24.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN | ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 5.4 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN | ASIAGO ENCRUSTED UNCURED ALL BEEF FRANKS IN A BLANKET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 134 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 616 MG | 682 MG |