CHICKEN PESTO CHICKEN vs TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN PESTO CHICKEN: 5
vs
TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS: 5
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN PESTO CHICKEN | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 222 cal | 105 cal | |
| Protein | 11.6 g | 6.1 g | |
| Carbs | 29.3 g | 10.5 g | |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fiber | 1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN PESTO CHICKEN | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN PESTO CHICKEN | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 101 MG | 88 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 505 MG | 202 MG |