CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs SUSTAINABLE SEAS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SUSTAINABLE SEAS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 0
vs
SUSTAINABLE SEAS: 4
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SUSTAINABLE SEAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 92 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 19.7 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SUSTAINABLE SEAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SUSTAINABLE SEAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 263 MG | 304 MG |