CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs WILD CAUGHT ARGENTINIAN RED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT ARGENTINIAN RED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 3
vs
WILD CAUGHT ARGENTINIAN RED SHRIMP: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD CAUGHT ARGENTINIAN RED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 14.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD CAUGHT ARGENTINIAN RED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD CAUGHT ARGENTINIAN RED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 106 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 248 MG | 671 MG |