CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 5
vs
ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 150 cal | |
| Protein | 64.3 g | 22.1 g | |
| Carbs | 21.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 6.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | ALASKAN COHO WILD CAUGHT SALMON FULL SIDE FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 425 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,071 MG | 44 MG |