CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs SUSTAINABLE SEAS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 5 out of 15 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 5
vs
SUSTAINABLE SEAS: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SUSTAINABLE SEAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 23.2 g | 23.2 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SUSTAINABLE SEAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 10.7 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 1.1 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SUSTAINABLE SEAS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 134 MG | 0 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 112 UG | 0 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 304 MG |